The 2 Out of 3 Principle: Why Some Projects Just Click

You don't need the perfect project to say yes. I've said no to high-paying work that felt wrong, and yes to zero-budget projects that turned into something great. The difference is a simple rule: great people, interesting work, good money - at least two out of three must be true.

By Jordi Buskermolen2 min read
founder-lessonsdecisions
The 2 Out of 3 Principle: Why Some Projects Just Click

I've been building digital products for over two decades now, and somewhere along the way I figured out why some projects energize me and others drain me - even when they look similar on paper.

It comes down to what I call the "2 out of 3" principle. Every project has three potential qualities:

  1. Great people - the kind you'd grab coffee with even if there wasn't a project involved
  2. Interesting work - something that makes you think differently, solves a real problem, or pushes you technically
  3. Good money - either upfront or through future potential like equity or partnership

Here's the thing: you don't need all three. But you absolutely need at least two.

Why This Works

A fascinating project with amazing people but tight budget? I'm in. The energy and learning make up for the financial gap.

Well-paying work that's straightforward but lacks chemistry with the team? Probably not the right fit. Money alone doesn't sustain motivation when you're deep in the work.

An exciting venture with people you trust, where the money comes later through equity or growth? That's exactly the kind of partnership I love.

What This Really Means

This isn't about being picky - it's about being honest. When at least two of these elements align, the work feels right. You show up energized. You do better work. Everyone wins.

When only one box is checked, you're compensating. And compensation breeds resentment, shortcuts, or burnout.

The Surprising Part

The "2 out of 3" rule has made me say yes to projects I might have passed on and no to projects that looked perfect on paper. It's helped me build better relationships, do work I'm proud of, and stay genuinely excited about what I'm building.

It's not a rigid formula - it's a gut check. Before committing to anything, I ask myself: which two of these three am I getting? If I can't clearly identify two, it's probably not the right fit.

Sometimes the best business decisions aren't about maximizing every variable. They're about knowing which combinations actually work for you.

Originally published on LinkedIn.

Want more of this?

I write regularly on LinkedIn about what I'm building and learning: agency growth, AI development, product judgment, and the messy reality behind making things work.

Follow on LinkedIn